Yodelling Llama

September 29, 2008

Channel 101: LA Roundup (September 2008).

Filed under: Channel 101 — Chris @ 8:37 pm

Wimpy’s much-anticipated “I’ll gladly pay you Tuesday” popped up in the top-rated sophomore effort of “The Pop.” But Scott Chernoff’s delivery was, like much of the episode, a little off. The noirish style of the debut has morphed into a sunnier set of effects, many of which look cheap in the light of day. The spinach-fueled gangland warfare of the pilot has been replaced by a more traditional “Bluto is foiled in attempting to foil Popeye” plot. The blended premise is starting to separate back into its component parts. A slump? To be sure. Is all lost? Probably not. Kyle Kinane, et al. have enough charisma to hold this ship together for a while, regardless of what they’re given to do. B-

Water and Power” #6 answers my question from last month: where’s Scottie? Now I need to pose a new question: where did the lovely procedural scriptedness of the first five episodes go? B-

The latest “Making Mistakes” makes great use of Boyz II Men in formulating a lovely series of father-son moments. Mike McCafferty’s aging former varsity basketball star is especially tasty on this go-around. A satisfying return to form. B+

The French-speaking tuerta-driver is probably the most giggle-inducing part “Boner for Boner” on its second go-around. But its the inexplicable intrigue of the Dude, Where’s My Car? sort that makes “Boner” work as well as it does. B+

What a devilishly strange newcomer “Compassion” is. Essentially, a somewhat malevolent talking head with a low-rent Power Point-esque overlay. Vaguely captivating, but mostly dull. C-

The cleverness of the “celebrity sibling edition!!!!” conceit of the second and final episode of “Trippin’ or Stylin’” gave its actors an excuse to unleash mediocre impersonations and explain away the mediocrity. Which illustrates my problem with this program beautifully: it’s dead on, very clever, and yet simply and utterly fails to entertain because, well, competently executing the double-bad is really difficult. That said, I did dig on the guy that played Vincent D’Onofrio’s sister, Sarah. C

Alphabet Men” felt a little derivative of “House of Cosbys,” what with its being populated with bastardized knock-offs of an iconic 80s television star, its “funny voice” comedy, its non sequiturs, and the fact that it is animated. Derivative can be entertaining, though. B-

The Adventures of Lisa and Friends” has a creepy photographed/drawn look that would be endearing if it packed a little more…oomph. But girls being catty does not quality programming make. D

Why were the 50s computer geeks taking shots of white wine from stemless glasses “Game Boys“? No matter: the inspiration for this particular Zaret-Stair production is pretty clear, and the concept had legs. But…the inattention to period detail, the hammy over-acting, and the flat jokes didn’t make the grade. C-

Boys Club” showed a lot of contempt for the audience. But it had a few humorous moments. I’d say it was a draw. C

Racial tension.

Filed under: Politics — Chris @ 4:50 pm

In order to address racism squarely and completely, should we strive for a post-racial society, or champion racial harmony? With the former, you may find yourself in the uncomfortable position of not being able to call bullshit on a man with centuries of documented Scandinavian ancestors self-identifying as “[culturally] black.” But with the latter, the phrase “those people” will still make appearances. With the former, you’re leaning hard toward nurture over nature, and denying any number of helpful categories vis-à-vis e.g. medical propensity and witness descriptions. With the latter, you’ve got an outsized nature too often providing hypotheses for the status quo. Although miscegenation may ultimately render the question moot, when the “race never matters” ideal conflicts with the “race matters sometimes” ideal, which one trumps, and under what circumstances?

September 28, 2008

As Putin rears his head…

Filed under: Humor,Politics — Chris @ 4:02 pm

Days late, but I found this pretty funny:

[From BoingBoing.]

September 22, 2008

Knee.

Filed under: Personal — Chris @ 5:26 pm

On the morning of the second day of my recent backpacking trip, I twisted my knee. Being several miles from anywhere, I didn’t have much choice but to walk on it. Which made it worse. Painful.

After returning, I kept it easy for a week or so. Seemed to be healing just fine. Today when I went to go hand out koozies to Evergreen freshmen and walked around the forested concrete Sovietness (sans KGB-sponsored gargoyles), my injury seems to have come back. With a vengeance. What to do?

[Aside: this seems another piece of anecdotal evidence confirming my longstanding belief that active people are much less healthy than inactive people, if "unhealthy" is broadly defined to include activity-caused injuries.]

September 20, 2008

Channel 101: NY Roundup (September 2008).

Filed under: Channel 101 — Chris @ 8:49 am

The Volvo commandeering opening sequence (a continuity work-around for an absent vehicle from past episodes?), the excessive cocaine sampling, the boxes, the endless supply of ammunition, and the “two days from retirement” cliché of the fifth “Scissor Cop were giggle-inducing. The twisty final scene…delicious. Have Westphal, Silvestro, and Prine finally hit their stride? Or have I finally glommed on to the vibe “Scissor Cop” is giving? A-

Debuting at #2, “Cooking with the Single Guy” is as-advertised. Host Matt Saccullo is the likable host of a low-rent cooking show with a “single guy” target audience. Done fairly straight, the program largely lives up to expectations. But if it weren’t for the parting shot, I’d have been largely disappointed with the lack of ambition. As it stands, much like 101: LA newcomer “Boner for Boner,” I’m intrigued enough to be cautiously optimistic. B-

The long-awaited “Sean” episode of “Mister Glasses” leans heavily toward architecture, which is surprisingly surprising for a show about architects, with a seemingly incongruent set of client mandates regarding a building as the focal point. The episode also runs a bit more noir than the usual “Glasses.” Overall, a very strong outing, especially with the awkwardly demoralizing concluding words of Mister Glasses to Sean. [Aside: why did Shelly Slocum replace Ellie Kemper?] A-

Captain Ultra’s confusion regarding Stan’s diagrams in the eighteenth episode of “The Defenders of Stan” provided a chuckle or two. As did Stan’s “yes” at the tail. And I can only assume the former schoolfellow from the head was a set-up for some future thread. Could use some more maniacal laughter, though. B+

Jess Lane, adorable as always, plays a lonely science geek who hangs out with her cat in newcomer “Me and My Cat.” A charming affair that’s one part “Mister Wizard,” and one part “BJ and the Bear,” with a dash of “Gilmore Girls.” B

The seventh and final “Majestic Dragon” disappointingly had a straightforward hallucinogen-oriented episode, and didn’t really resonate. C

The Outer Boroughs” was cancelled. Was it because it really stick to any sort of consistent format? Or because it wasn’t really that entertaining. Hmm… C-

Perhaps “Penguin & Gwen” may have found more favor with the audience if it hadn’t had to compete with “Me and My Cat,” another girl + man in animal costume program that debuted this month. Perhaps not. C-

MILF Solicitors” has a pretty great premise (incompetent would-be Internet porn kings who seem to be missing the staging and financial wherewithal to pull it off), a number of laugh out loud moments, and a few choice self-referential moments. I’m not sure it was series material, but it was pretty funny. B+

September 18, 2008

Bathroom.

Filed under: Language — Chris @ 8:08 pm

The idea of a “bathroom” is, I take it, a room in which one bathes. A “bathroom” without a bath is an anathema, although I can understand the impulse of wanting to include rooms with showers within the “bathroom” category. What I cannot understand is tendency of some to refer to the space in which only toilets are located as a “bathroom.” [See e.g. the traditional first floor powder room, or the retail store washroom.] It contains no bath. It isn’t used for anything resembling bathing. It contains one or more toilets, and one or more sinks. Nothing else of note. Not a bathroom.

Which got me to thinking: why do we tend to group showers and baths with toilets. Perhaps there was a time when indoor plumbing was an expensive and alien enough concept to suggest running water ought to be ghettoized within a residence. But no more. Water flows freely in whatever room it is required. So why not segregate the idea of a “bathroom” and a “toiletroom.” Really, do we want to associate the room in which we excrete with the room in which we cleanse? Isn’t that, well, repulsive?

September 17, 2008

Bring Me the Head of Jerry Reilly.

Filed under: Olympia — Chris @ 6:11 pm

Given my sour experience at the last public meeting regarding rezoning the isthmus, I was not particularly eager to revisit the pointlessness and mind-numbing stupidity of last night’s edition. And given the news coverage of the event, apparently I didn’t miss much. Again, almost everyone who testified seemed to misunderstand what the hearing was about: whether to allow somewhat taller structures than are currently allowed to be built on a narrow strip of land in downtown Olympia. The hearing was not about whether building should be allowed on that strip of land at all, whether some or all of the current structures should be razed and replaced with park, whether someone should be permitted to build luxury residences downtown in general or on the isthmus in particular, or whether Tri Vo specifically should be permitted to build luxury residences, and if so whether it should be granted taxpayer-backed financial incentives to do so. Some of these questions, especially the financial incentives question, are valid topics for debate.

Others, like the so-called “raze and replace with a park” option, are not. Contrary to what John Reilly, member and spokesperson of the Olympia Capitol Park Foundation, and his 4400 signatures suggest. The reason? Reilly “said he doesn’t know how [turning the isthmus into a park] would be done – perhaps with some mix of private and public money – but that the idea should be studied.” To that end, the Olympia Capitol Park Foundation is directing the City through a local initiative “to conduct a feasibility analysis on acquiring and developing a part of the isthmus as a public park.” I can tell you right now: it isn’t feasible. Even without the rezone, the isthmus land is extraordinarily valuable, and therefore costly to purchase. The money simply isn’t there. Requesting that the City expend tax dollars conducting such an analysis is wasteful and irresponsible.

To that end, I’m asking that the members of the Olympia Capitol Park Foundation pony up the dough for this feasibility analysis. If these private citizens put their own money where their petition-signing pens are, and if the resulting feasibility analysis indicates anything other than “expensive,” I’ll personally reimburse the Foundation up to $1000. [I'd offer to reimburse more, but frankly I'm not the sort of person who could afford the units at Larida Passage, and I'm conscious of the fact that I may be wrong about the value of the land.]

September 16, 2008

Herb Alpert.

Filed under: Music — Chris @ 8:51 pm

According to the latest issue of Parade, Herb Alpert is second only to Oprah Winfrey in terms of charitable giving amongst celebrities. Circa 2007. Which I found surprising, given that I know Herb Alpert primarily because of his association with the Tijuana Brass and “Spanish Flea.” But after realizing that Alpert is the “A” of “A&M Records,” that he has a fortune of sufficient size that he could give away tens of millions of dollars a year is not as arresting.

Camping at Rainier.

Filed under: Personal — Chris @ 7:14 pm

Backpacking! D, her friend Jen, and I started up the Owyhigh Lakes Trail on the east side of Mount Rainier last Saturday afternoon; camped at Tamanos Creek; saw and heard pika, the cutest little lagomorphs in the region; and discovered Mary Janes’ food is pretty damned tasty. Sunday, hiked passed the trail’s titular bodies of water, through the subalpine meadows at the tail end of the flower season, down the other side of the pass into the Kotsuck Creek basin, down to the Deer Creek campground, heard a randy bull elk en route, and concluded Backpacker’s Pantry products range from bland but serviceable to borderline inedible. Monday, climbed again, up the Eastside Trail to Tipsoo Lake, saw a youngish bull elk and a grouse of some sort; ended up leaving the packs by the roadside about two-thirds along the way with J so we could make a little better time.

Fun? Absolutely. Great thinking time. Ideas like freeze-dried butter (inspired by Mountain House‘s miraculous freeze-dried chicken breast), GPS-triggered backcountry audio guides (compare with museum audio guides), and extra compression sacks for clothing emerged. The steepness of the trail got to us at time. The spiffy park map let us down at one point (the Deer Creek campground is on the Eastside Trail, not the steep-as-fuck to-the-road spur). I twisted my ankle. But overall: good trip.

September 9, 2008

Victory.

Filed under: Politics — Chris @ 5:17 pm

What does victory in Iraq look like? The traditional metric for war involves signatures on a peace treaty of some sort. But with whom would the coalition forces negotiate the terms of surrender? Who would be qualified to sign such a document?

I am troubled by John McCain’s reference to the “surge” “working” precisely because I strongly suspect he, like me, has no idea what victory looks like. That, ultimately, the goals are so ill-defined that “working” is a false concept. “Working” implies progress toward some end result. A reduced troop body count is not an end result. A reduced civilian body count is not an end result. Troop withdraw is an end result. And until I hear John McCain say that, I’m not only not going to vote for him come November, I’m going to discourage others from doing so as well.

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress