Yodelling Llama

August 31, 2006

Duck Season.

Filed under: Film — Chris @ 9:51 am

Fernando Eimbcke’s Duck Season is precisely the sort of low-budget film that the whole indie filmmaking revolution was founded upon. Smart, funny, extremely inexpensive but never cheap, professional, and deeply affecting.

Duck Season is, narratively speaking, one of those films that begins with what promises to be an ordinary day in the life of its lead characters, but spirals into something a bit more exceptional. Think Clerks.

Duck Season is, thematically speaking, one of those films about the rage of divorce and the sexual confusion of adolescence and the despair of loneliness. Think Mrs. Doubtfire or Stepmom.

Duck Season is, visually speaking, stark and ordinary. Think Stranger than Paradise.

Duck Season is, comedically speaking, all over the place, incorporating slapstick, stoner giggles, word play, and awkward misunderstandings. Think Waiting for Guffman.

Great little flick. Well worth the 80 or so minutes.

***1/2

August 30, 2006

The Science of Sleep, preamble.

Filed under: Film — Chris @ 9:48 pm

After seeing the trailer for The Science of Sleep several times, and after listening to an interview with Michel Gondry, I am in a very bad place. I am looking forward to Science of Sleep with such anticipation, I will almost certainly hate it.

I adore Gael Garcia Bernal, and think him extremely sexy. The more I see Charlotte Gainsbourg, the more I want a daughter so that I might name her Charlotte. Gondry has been impressing me for years, and I doubt he’ll stop. The stop motion looks fantastic. And the subject matter of Science of Sleep (dreams, love, neighbors) look extremely intriguing. Please, someone must burst my bubble. Otherwise I’ll never forgive myself.

Yacht Rock.

Filed under: Channel 101 — Chris @ 12:58 am

One of my favorite 101s of all time is “Yacht Rock.” I was sad to see it go last month. I’m happy, however, to see it break out of the 101 format and keep going on its own. [Yes, I know I'm being a hypocrite, given my position toward "Your Magic Touched Me." Bite me.] Yes, ladies and gentlemen, the creators of “Yacht Rock” are planning at least two more episodes. Hooray!

Channel 102 Roundup.

Filed under: Channel 101 — Chris @ 12:24 am

Channel 102, having taken a month off, should have been especially good. That this month’s primetime is fronted by a newcomer, however, does not bode well.

“I’ll pay you back when I have pockets.” Excepting, of course, that “The Defenders of Stan” is absolutely hilarious. Set amid the premise of “what if there are too many superheros,” “Stan’ delivers consistent laughs on a high concept. Going places? Absolutely. And full of hot chicks to boot.

“Communism and Al Qaeda and homosexuality will run rampant.” The second installment of “Dr. Miracles” is about the same in terms of production values. And about the same in terms of hilarity. That is to say it is somewhat above average. Very good use of The Beatles and Ghostface Killah. And abortion as a comedy agent. Kudos to “Dr. Miracles.”

“Everyone knows white is God’s favorite color.” The second edition of “American Cookbook” clarifies what it was about the program that attracted viewers originally. It is witty and simple. ’nuff said. Hooray!

“Miles, you’re a dweeb. What we need is a hero.” “The Bicycle Thief” manages to maintain, after a slight stall in the first part of its second episode, the unbearable and yet tantalizing tension it has developed. Cheers.

“There will be no fucking, or sucking, or tenderness. The Baby Birds are through.” I realized recently how young I am. It wasn’t until I heard a review of the mediocre Boyton Beach Club that I realized there was a late 60s, early 70s program called “Love, American Style” that almost certainly served as at least a partial source for “Sexual Intercourse: American Style. Imagine that. The program itself continues to puzzle. In a good way. I suppose.

August 29, 2006

Hispanic ruler.

Filed under: Broadcast Media,Politics — Chris @ 11:15 pm

A few weeks back, I started to suggest that a strong male Hispanic ruler would be good for this country, based mostly upon Edward James Olmos’s portrayal of Commander Adama and Martin Sheen’s portrayal of President Bartlet. I stopped myself mostly because I read an interview with Olmos wherein he objected to being characterized as a “Hispanic” actor, as opposed to simply an actor who happened to be Hispanic. I’m not sure stopping was appropriate.

While it may be racist to so suggest, I will do so nonetheless: we need a strong male Hispanic ruler in this country. An American leader with Hispanic roots. Cultural roots that indicate a certain strength with regard to leadership. Hear me? I know my points of reference are television characters. I know in reality what really need is a competent leader. But I’m prepared to narrow the focus to a certain flavor of Spanish speaker for the next couple of election cycles, if only to heighten the probability of success. I’m disenchanted with what the white folks have to offer. And I want a change. Speaking as a white guy.

Friends with Money.

Filed under: Film — Chris @ 10:55 pm

Wow, what a train wreck. Nothing but excessively developed female characters at the expense of story. There were, admittedly, a few moments at which I laughed. But overall, Friends with Money is as much a mess as you can imagine.

The characters are, by and large, believable. But uninteresting. Rich people floundering through life before your eyes. Wow. A straight guy who appears gay? A gay guy effectively passing? So early 90s. Give me something with meat, Ms. Holofcener. Lest I think all you’re capable of is self-loathing in the face of high end lotion.

**

Friends with Money, preamble.

Filed under: Film — Chris @ 8:15 pm

Netflix sent me Friends with Money today. I am about to watch it. But I have a few preliminary points about the DVD presentation:

  • Sofia Coppola’s Marie Antoinette looks absolutely delicious. The marketing makes it resemble Moulin Rouge, which makes me want to see it. I can only hope the Cannes critics were merely caught off guard when they panned it.
  • Sydney Pollack’s Sketches of Frank Gehry, also previewed before Friends with Money, looks unwatchable. Dump it.
  • Pedro Almodovar’s Volver appears to be fantastic. But then again, I was not particularly impressed with Bad Education. At least not as much as I was with Talk to Her and All about My Mother. Should I be worried? Of course not. Penelope Cruz is an absolute goddess. How could it not be good?
  • The DVD presenters for Friends with Money put both the “widescreen” and “full screen” versions on the disc. I’ve resigned myself to the idea that most Americans are not bothered when part of the film is slashed for their viewing pleasure. That, contrary to expectations, they appreciate it, so that none of their malformed television set is wasted. But to put the “full screen” option as the default? However good Friends with Money may be, it’s just lost a great deal of respect from film lovers. It has shat in the mouth of film buffs in favor of the idiot fans. Lovely.

Social Security and other safety nets.

Filed under: Politics — Chris @ 11:13 am

A general principal that seems to underly American psychology is that an individual ought to take care of his own. That an American ought to work to feed, clothe and house himself (and his dependents, should he choose to have any), and he ought to set aside funds for the day when he can no longer work, either because of illness or old age. But it is recognized by all but the most callous that a string of bad luck can derail even the well conceived plans. So what to do?

One possibility is nothing. That the cost to society of compensating individuals for their bad luck is simply too high.

Another possibility is to provide a safety net of some sort. When an individual unexpectedly and without fault loses his job, government supplies a (temporary) flow of funds until the individual is able to find work. When an individual is unable to save enough during his working years to pay for retirement, government makes up the difference until the individual dies.

The challenge to this way of thinking is that some people will use these safety nets to live without responsibility for their entire lives. An individual may retire early, or live the high life and fail to save, or spend his money on drugs and seek food stamps to feed his children. How do we weed out these folks?

Some may suggest we shouldn’t bother. That the cost of finding the cheaters–who are, most likely, few and far between–is too high. I am sympathetic to this plight.

Here’s another solution: Set up government approved (though not run) retirement accounts. If an individual consistently (say, 11 months of the year from 18 to 65) puts something into those accounts, he’ll receive, upon retirement, full Social Security benefits. If an individual fails to consistently contribute, he’ll receive something less than his full benefits (say 95%). For those who are truly in a hard place because of bad luck (e.g. have an ailing parent whose medical bills drained everything and then some), but who are responsible Americans, a penny contribution ought to do it. And when an individual has more to save, he can contribute more. For those who cannot even be bothered to contemplate saving, even when it is made this simple, a light penalty results.

Thoughts?

August 28, 2006

Channel 101 Roundup.

Filed under: Channel 101 — Chris @ 5:05 pm

The seventh installment of “Classroom” is the “bulimia” episode. Touching enough in its own right, “Classroom” has, in recent months, consistently failed to bring enough funny to the table. It’s almost as if, instead of parodying after school specials, the creators of “Classroom” actually want to make after school specials. Amazingly enough, though, it works pretty well. Works about as well as an extremely low budget “Strangers with Candy,” at any rate.

“I bet your dick is shaped like a tuna can, huh, short and fat and…” I was all prepared to hate “Your Magic Touched Me Nights” as a cheat (and as a continuation of a bad program). But “Nights” won me over by completely changing formats (from whatever the hell “YMTM” was to “CSI” / “Law & Order: SVU” parody), introducing at least the shells of good characters (to be filled in later episodes), imparting some unnecessary but amusing bathroom humor, and by delivering some fine production levels. With “Nights,” Nagata et al. finally have a worthy place in the primetime.

Newcomer “Raptor” is a nice office comedy, with the twist being that one of the new guy’s coworkers is a dinosaur. Reminded me of the set-up from the “Homer’s Enemy” episode of “The Simpsons.” In a good way. I’m not sure that showing “Ray” as much as they did was wise. And I’m not sure that the show is sustainable long term; that is, it may have blown its load in the first episode. But worth a watch.

The third “Phone Sexxers” has a nice story arc and a few amusing moments. But methinks Mr. Ridley’s penchant for fantasy and fight scenes is overtaking Mr. Gheith’s comedic and swarthy abilities. And that tip in the balance of power is hurting the show. It’s funny: “Phone Sexxers” is one of the better 101s precisely because it fails to follow a formula. But it suffers for it as well, drawing from too many sources and too many genres as it tries to tell stories. Without grounded characters with grounded motives, and without a consistent setting, a fan is left asea.

The latest Sloan and Yonda offering, “Fun Rangers” is strange. Amusing at times. But mostly strange. Not sure what to make of it. Seems almost like Steve Sutton bait. Almost.

August 27, 2006

Bruce Guthrie.

Filed under: Politics — Chris @ 10:36 am

I mentioned Bruce Guthrie before. Around the time I first heard of him, I subscribed to his blog. In his latest entry, where he’s discussing a forum/debate he attended (that was apparently below the radar of “serious” candidates Mike McGavick and Maria Cantwell), he mentions instant runoff voting in a positive light. Good for him, recognizing that, contrary to the initial impressions of many with whom I have discussed the topic, IRV is good for small party candidates. Also, with each blog entry I become more and more impressed with Guthrie. At least with regard to issue positions and ability to explain. Less and less inclined to throw my support behind Maria.

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress