Yodelling Llama

January 31, 2006

Puppet Rapist.

Filed under: Channel 101 — Chris @ 9:40 pm

The new crop of Channel 102 shows is topped by a very amusing and rather disturbing pilot called “Puppet Rapist.” Amazingly well-acted and slickly produced, I think we have here a reason not to mourn the passing of “Teen Homicide” with too many tears.

[Also, did you notice that "McCourt's in Session" was submitted to both 101 and 102? And that while 101 placed the show at #4 in primetime, on 102 it didn't even make primetime? Does that mean 102 is more discriminating? Or does it simply reflect the mood of the voters that evening? Or something else entirely?]

House of Cosbys.

Filed under: Channel 101 — Chris @ 9:11 pm

I was rather sad when Bill Cosby’s attorney abused the judicial system by sending a would-be frivolous cease and desist letter under California’s out-of-control right of privacy law. I was even more sad when Channel 101 took House of Cosbys down. But after reading Dan Harmon’s explanation and watching the fan-made Episode #5, I’m feeling less sad.

Oscar nominations.

Filed under: Film — Chris @ 12:06 pm

So the Oscar nominations came out today. And I have some thoughts. As a preliminary matter, I am pleased to see the abominable Revenge of the Sith was blackballed out of every category except makeup. Not even a sound editing or visual effects nomination? Take that, Lucas!

Best Picture. I suppose I shouldn’t be surprised that Crash was nominated for Best Picture. But I am. Because while it has much to recommend it as an effort, it failed so spectacularly as a film. Any other surprises there? No. And I suspect, based on nothing more than buzz, that Brokeback will walk away with the statue.

Best Actor. Again, no surprises. Maybe a bit that Ralph Fiennes did not get a nod for Constant Gardener. But not really. Prediction: Philip Seymour Hoffman.

Best Actress. What a worthless category. How is it that, year after year, so many women are nominated for work in films that were unwatched, unwatchable, or both? For the Best Actor category, only one poorly received film is represented, and that is Hustle & Flow. For Best Actress, we have at least two: Mrs. Henderson Presents and North Country. And, arguably, Transamerica and Pride & Prejudice were not exactly golden children overall. Is this a role writing problem? A critical problem? A problem with females’ agents? Or is the Academy simply unable to recognize good work by actresses unless they are surrounded by shit? Anyway, I suspect Ms. Witherspoon will end up walking away with it. Even though, from what I’ve heard, the not-even-nominated Laura Linney ought to be crying on the stage. Or perhaps the also-not-nominated Maria Bello.

Best Supporting Actor. First, where is Mickey Rourke’s nomination? I mean, I know he wouldn’t he wouldn’t win. But to completely avoid Sin City is an injustice. Second, I smell a bait-and-switch here. George Clooney deserves it. And Syriana deserves it. But Paul Giamatti will take it. Because the voters still feel guilty about snubbing him for his brilliant work in Sideways.

Best Supporting Actress. We’re postured a little better here than with Best Actress. For quality of the film, I mean. And because Amy Adams was good in Junebug, because Junebug was otherwise overlooked, and because this category has often been used to tap the underseen films and up-and-coming actresses, I’m predicting the delightful Ms. Adams beat out the better Ms. Weisz here.

Best Director. Ang Lee. Director of the godforsaken mess that was Hulk. Nominated for Best Director. And likely most deserving of it, to boot. How unexpected and unpleasant. Next thing you know, Uwe Boll will win an Oscar for a thoughtful and heartfelt film about racism in modern day Chicago.

Best Original Screenplay. Here we get to a truly worthwhile category. But unfortunately, I have only seen Crash and Syriana of the five. And, naturally, I’m leaning toward Syriana for what I would prefer to see win. But, in all honesty, I suspect Match Point will win, for pretty much the same reason Roman Polanski won the Best Director prize in 2003 for The Pianist. Of course, in that case Polanski deserved it. Whereas I suspect Noah Baumbach really ought to win for The Squid and the Whale over “Has Been” Woody.

Best Adapted Screenplay. Another worthwhile category. And here I’m in a little better position, having only missed Capote and Brokeback thus far. But I must say I’m surprised to see A History of Violence nominated. Whatever History had going for it, it wasn’t the sparse screenplay. Hell, the only person with any good lines was William Hurt, and he was having too much fun playing the ham to lead me to suspect great brilliance in the lines themselves. Prediction: Brokeback. Again.

Best Animated Film. No Pixar release this year. So do we repeat 2002 and give Miyazaki the prize? Or do we honor Nick Park for the lovely Curse of the Were-Rabbit? Or do we give in to hype and mediocrity and honor Mr. Burton? I know what I would do, which is spark some sexy Gromit-Statuette action. But the Academy? Fucking Corpse Bride.

That’s all I care to think about. I don’t understand what goes into cinematography or art direction well enough to comment intelligently. I just don’t care about the Original Song category. And I have yet to hear enough about the Documentary and Foreign Language nominees to formulate an opinion. Yet. Stay tuned?

Sleepless in Seattle.

Filed under: Film — Chris @ 10:25 am

Yesterday, BoingBoing linked to an altered genre trailer for Sleepless in Seattle, which recut the film as a thriller. I only just got a chance to watch it, because the link was inundated off the web temporarily. And it is excellent. Compare favorably to the recut of The Shining as a romantic dramedy.

Smoking.

Filed under: Politics — Chris @ 9:42 am

Can anyone direct me to a comprehensive study that has shown, one way or another, that cigarette smokers cost governments more (in terms of health care services, retirement benefits, disability benefits, etc.) than nonsmokers? How about one that has a neutral funding source (i.e. not funded by interested governments and not funded by cigarette companies)? How about one that takes into account revenue differences (i.e. smokers earn less than nonsmokers, so pay less in income taxes; or smokers pay tobacco taxes, while nonsmokers do not)?

January 30, 2006

Tofu.

Filed under: Food & Drink — Chris @ 2:35 pm

I have come to the conclusion, after years of being a vegetarian, that tofu is, at its heart, an ingredient. Like flour. Or ginger. Which is to say I find it inappropriate simply to warm it up and nibble away. It needs to be blended into fake mayo or cupcake frosting. Or deep fried to create spongy cubes for stir fries. Or baked and sliced for sandwiches. But standing alone, tofu is about as appetizing as corn starch. Not repulsive, exactly. Just reclusive. Like it needs to get dressed up to go out, and it needs to go out with some friends.

Logic.

Filed under: Language,Law — Chris @ 1:32 pm

The authors of the Uniform Commercial Code, while generally brilliant drafters, have failed me on a few occasions. One such occasion is the drafting of Section 3-502(b)(3), which reads, “If a draft is payable on a date stated in the draft, the draft is dishonored if (i) presentment for payment is duly made to the drawee and payment is not made on the day the draft becomes payable or the day of presentment, whichever is later, or (ii) presentment for acceptance is duly made before the day the draft becomes payable and the draft is not accepted on the day of presentment.” The “Official Comment” to Section 3-502 indicates that “with respect to drafts, presentment for payment or acceptance is required” before a draft can be dishonored. So what the UCC authors meant was “…the draft is dishonored if and only if (i) presentment…” To fail to imbue statutory language with as much logical consistency as is possible–and I’ll admit, language, being what it is, does restrict that possibility somewhat–gives rise to frustration and murderous thoughts.

Alive in Joburg.

Filed under: Film — Chris @ 10:19 am

Just watched a short film called “Alive in Joburg” ’bout aliens landing in South Africa in 1990 and the apartheid-esque reaction of the populace. Filmed documentary style. Pretty good.

[From BoingBoing.]

January 29, 2006

Kingdom of Loathing.

Filed under: Gaming — Chris @ 11:04 pm

I started playing Kingdom of Loathing today. Because I read an interview with the creator of del.icio.us where it was disclosed he dug on it. And I must say, it is rather amusing, in a silly sort of way. Recommended.

[Contrast with the disappointing Urban Dead game.]

Salon.

Filed under: Broadcast Media — Chris @ 6:51 pm

I recently reupped my Salon Premium subscription. Because I have more time this semester. Because it is an exceedingly good value. And because it is an exceedingly good publication.

I have written a few letters-to-the-editor that may be of interest to my readers. Like my response to Andrew Leonard’s piece on biofuels. Or my attack on Andrew O’Hehir’s Sundance round-up. Or my nitpickery on Leonard’s look at a particularly interesting piece of historical industrial espionage. Or my explanation about when I gave up on “The West Wing.”

If they’re not of interest, many apologies.

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress